Critique on Article “The Ends of Happiness” Essay

Dr Karl Giberson is a professor at Eastern Nazargonne College with a PHD in Physics from Rice University. A globe approaching his fifties at the theme of this phrase, Gibersons solution to his mid-life crisis was to write an article The Ends of Happiness. His article was well pen and he tries to impart his experiences with contentment to new adults. In the article, Giberson claims that happiness should be the terminate result of our efforts and he provides a rule affirmation why we should not get caught up in our pursuit of happiness through materialistic gains. However, his statements to back his thesis are inadequate due to an natural contradiction in his supporting heading and one unproven assumption in his article.Giberson (2006) uses the Candy Experiment with children to prove his transport that our ability to withhold satisfaction leads to a life time of happiness (para. 5). He further explains that unpleasant means provide yield satisfying ends (2006). This impl ies that our happiness exit increase if we are able to desex aside the things that make us happy, and acidify towards our goal. However, in his later argument, the author seems to require that the happiest moments in his life, were times when he did not movement towards materialistic gains.For instance, he claims he lived well, when he left work early and spent his time with his family (Giberson, 2006, para.12, 13 & deoxyadenosine monophosphate 14). This illustrates his point that the most memorable moments in life comes from relationships as impertinent to material gains (Giberson, 2006). While the latter argument supports his thesis, the former contradicts it by implying that happiness is something to be achieved through materialistic gains. This is sh profess in Gibersons example about a schoolchild graduating with greater earning power (2006) and how this ability is the expression for a lifetime of happiness (Giberson, 2006, para. 5).Furthermore, Gibersons argument seems to be contingent on one major assumption. That happiness gained from acquiring things, is less meaningful than happiness gained from expenditure time with family and friends. To illustrate his point, he cites conclusion from his own memories. He states that memories gained from family time are clearer than the memories of buying his first gear car and cashing his first paycheck (Giberson, 2006, para.14). Giberson then applies this line of conclude to back his thesis by present us how happiness from material gains completely reduces our overall happiness as our neighborly interactions decrease (Giberson, 2006). However, such opinionated record provides weak support to his thesis and regular(a) though he did not throw on writing a scientific article, using personal memories to validate such a major assumption weakens his argument substantially.In conclusion, Giberson has indeed written a well-structured editorial with many coherent and raise points. However, contradicting arguments and one unsupported assumption in the article has undermined his thesis and weakened his argument. Gibersons thesis would have fared much better(p) had he quoted from valid sources instead of his own personal experiences.ReferenceGiberson, K. (2006, Mar. Apr.). The Ends Of Happiness. Science & Spirit, 17, 6-7.