Friday, March 8, 2019

Constitutional Reform of 1997 in United Kingdom

The UK piece of music has a mod atomic payoff 18tely successful history, it is highly tradition and has stood the test of time and, based on the fact that Britain has never suffered a violent revolution unlike France, we post therefore assume that the UK constitution has many another(prenominal) beneficial and enduring strengths. Our constitution ensures that Parliament, and therefore Government, can act quickly and decisively as they are unrestricted by excessive constitutional constraints. It is flexible and adaptable which distinctly shows thorugh after the 2010 general elections.However, the lack of restraints on the powers of Government and Parliament may be dangerous especially to minority and invidual mightys. on that point cause in any case been many doubts slightly this traditional constitution and many questions know been raise to do with the Monarchy and outdated institutions such as the FPTP system. The lack of separation of powers amongst Government and Par liament means that Government tends to dominate which in many eyes is seen as undemocratic.The premiere constitutional crystallize was to do with devolution Scotland twist of 1998, Wales action of 199 and the Belfast Agreement of 1998. The original nature of this neaten was so that considerable powers were transferred to the devolved representative bodies and executives. Labour wanted to bring about this change due to the fact that they were hugely popular in Wales and Scotland and so the Acts were a means of thanking them for their support.This reform has been believed to be long overdue and has been in truth beneficial and accommodate given each body the right to have more control over their region however it has caused a bigger rift of the UK and therefore has separated Britain even more. The second reform was the homo Rights Act of 1998. This reform has been extremely beneficial for minority and invididual rights, which has been reflected most tardily in the Abu Qatada c ase where a man who had made terrorist plans has been saved from expatriation to Jordan, where he would have most likely been prosecuted for his actions.The European Convention on Human Rights made this Act binding on all human beings bodies but the UK Parliament due to Parliament being sovereign. Although this act has been beneficial, it would have had more impact should it have been binding on Parliament. Another reform was the House of Lords the House Of Lords Act of 1999. Most of the hereditary peers lost their right to vote rights and there was a major cut down in the number of hereditary peers as it was lowered down to just 92.There was alike a decision to separate the Judges from the Lords ( Constitutional Reform Act of 2005) and move them into a seperate building across the road. It is believed to be a lower decision which has limited the powers of the Lords as many believed there should not be any hereditary peers. In fact a proposal has been do forward for a whole n ew house to be created. There were 3 other major changes introduced Greater London Authority Act 1999, Local Government Act 1999 and Freedom Of Information Act 2000.The first established an elected mayor in London with an elected fiction to which s/he is accountable for, the second allowed for local communities to elect a mayor if approved by a local referendum and the third gave the citizens the right to view documents and records of public bodies. Each of these has helped to reinforce democracy within the UK and helped to nourish the rights of each citizen by ensuring they are more politically involved and have the right to appoint and elect candidates for powerful positions.

No comments:

Post a Comment

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.