Use of Rhetoric in Anna Quindlens Evan’s Two Moms Essays

The essay, â€Å"Evan’s Two Moms†, was written by Anna Quindlen and published in The New York Times and the 2004 edition of Good Reasons with Contemporary Arguments. Also, this essay takes a liberal point of view concerning gay marriage and the ability to raise a child in a gay family. Throughout Quindlen’s essay, her structure introduces ethos, pathos and logos through a variety of court cases to gain the readers trust; she appeals to both emotion and logic in her reader through passion and unwavering intensity, which disapproves of those who take a radical point of view against gay marriage. Anna Quindlen’s structure of â€Å"Evan’s Two Moms† provides the reader with explicit details concerning the debate about gay marriage. Also, in Quindlen’s†¦show more content†¦A marriage is by definition a union between a man and a woman because we have defined it that way. However, she starts off by telling about a situation where gay adoption was accepted. In her first paragraph she states that, â€Å"a judge in New York approved an adoption of a six-year-old by his biological mother’s lesbian partner†. She also speaks of a seven year court case in which the care of a quadriplegic lesbian was given in her lover, and gives an example of company called Lotus announced that the gay partners of their employees would receive the same benefits as their spouses. She then goes on to talk about the negative judgment society imposes on gay marriages in society. She lists an event in which lawyer lost her job offer after the Attorney General found that she and her partner were getting married. She also lists other experiences such as when a child was refused admittance to the YMCA, and compared these to court cases such as Loving v Virginia, when the judge dismissed the trial provided Loving and his wife left the state of Virginia. Another key type of argument she uses is logos. These types of arguments are proved by different types of statistics. Quindlen shows different examples of how gays cannot receive their partners’ health insurance or benefits, asking how all the benefits of a straight marriage cannot be included in a gay marriage. She briefly talks of AIDS survivors that have been