Abington VS/ Schempp :: Free Essay Writer

Abington School District vs. SchemppRequired School PrayerIn 1949, a state-wide law was passed in Pennsylvania that required public rail students to read scriptures from the Bible and recite the Lords Prayer everyday in class. This law stayed intact until Edward Schempp challenged it nine years later. Pennsylvania wasnt the first or the only state to enforce law devising it mandatory for students to read from the Bible during school. Twenty-five additional states had laws allowing optional practice for the Bible. But in eleven of the twenty-five states, chat ups had decided those laws were unconstitutional. Mr. Schempp took the case to court in to 1958, claiming that required rendering for the Bible and recitation of the Lords Pray prohibited free exercise of religion for his children, and was therefore unconstitutional, nether the First Amendment. Mr. Schempp son, Ellory, stated under oath, that he didnt not cerebrate in savior Christ, or the Christian beliefs. He testified that ideas opposing to his were presented to him part he was at school in Abington High. He received penalisation because he refused to stand at attention during the recitation of the Lords Prayer and when requested to leave during the exercise, his demands were denied.One of the greatest witnesses was Rabbi Dr. Solomon Grayzel. Dr. Grayzel explained the psychological legal injury that could come from reading the New Testament without description. The context of the New Testament, without explanation of the work, had caused grievances in Jewish children while in similar required situations. This as well came to show that if a Jewish child could be offended and vacate by the Bible reading, any child of a family rejecting the principles of the Trinity and Jesus Christ would be equally offended, to the point that reading the Bible could be considered blasphemous. In argument for the recitation of the Lords Prayer, they said that reading the Bible not only was essential to the bu ilding of good moral philosophy and development of the minds of impressionable school children, it was free to be interpreted anyway because of lack of comment and explanation. They claimed that the Bible was not a religious work, and when viewed from the eyes of a Christian, it did express the message of Christianity.This case bounced back and away between Supreme Court and district court before eventually ending in 1963. Abington school district appealed to the Supreme Court later on it was not satisfied with the verdict at district court level.