'Existentialism and Humanistic Psychology Essay\r'

'Angst, in the very reputation of its part in Existentialism, is a read of being that is not completely ostracize in itself as common plurality might suppose. In a more(prenominal) positive sense, I believe angst is the generous recognition of iodin’s b aredom. Angst is the pass of ace’s realization that he is free and that nothing will for perpetu totallyy h aged him back. It becomes negative because once a someone gets a deeper understanding of how free he is, he tends to aid that he might not be adapted to do things even up and since nothing is property him back, thither is nothing to blame in case he fails.\r\nIn short, angst is â€Å" headache of the nothing” (Park, 1999). It is different from normal fear which comes from the environment and has an object and a sayable solution. For example, I fear spiders so I propitiate a course from dusty and old places. The object of the fear is ‘spiders’ and the solution is to ‘sta y away from dusty and old places’. In angst, the fear comes from within and there is basically neither object nor solution. There is simply angst.\r\nAnd that is what makes angst a terrible state. I think it is very difficult to feel this way because it is like asking questions with no answers. And if ever I get into this terrible state, I think will do one thing: convince myself to believe that there is nothing to fear and that I admit my family who will accept me no affair what. Meanwhile, the whole concept of Humanistic psychological science (the American version of Existentialism, I’ve read) interests me in a special way.\r\nThe different theories of Rogers, Maslow, Csikszentmihalyi, among another(prenominal)s that I learned from Chapter 13 gave me a touchstone by step understanding into the enquiry of my existence. I can’t fold though that they all are right nevertheless certainly, they provide interesting thoughts deserving pondering ( particularl y Rogers’ 19 Propositions). The homoistic theories they surrender are different from the ones we learned in previous chapters because they stress on the experiences of the human person rather than on things that are inherent or already active such as biology, genes, or private motives.\r\nThis means that since the theories of Humanists such as Rogers and Maslow focus on keep experience of the person, they let on a more positive climb up knowing that these experiences that shape a person can vary depending on how he reacts to events. In a simpler way, while Bem’s theories seem to say â€Å"Your fuss has genus Cancer so you will gift cancer, too. It’s in the blood” humanists say â€Å"Your mother has cancer. With the right attitude and lifestyle, you can retard having cancer yourself. ” Humanists are a bus friendlier.\r\nI agree with these humanists, for the most trigger off at least. I agree with the worldwide thought of a personâ₠¬â„¢s experience shaping his personality. However, there is one thing I personally protest based on experience. Rogers said that â€Å"this result [fully functioning person] could plainly occur for individuals who had get unconditional positive regard from the all important(p) population in their make loves” (Funder, 2007). I dissent with this because I know some bulk who, despite suffering from neglect from the people they love, still feel good just about themselves and have great personalities.\r\nOn the other hand, I give my nod to Maslow when he said â€Å"higher demand such as self-actualization could come to the fore only after more basic needs related to survival and security became well-to-do” (Funder, 2007). I personally believe self-realisation is a hierarchy and a continuing process. Thoughts on Punishment and Efficacy speculation â€Å"Punishment is a useful proficiency of operant conditioning if it is applied correctly, which it or so never is” (Funder, 2007). I am especially caught by the last phrase of the mention: it almost never is. I think punishment is something that is very tricky.\r\nIt is difficult to use in the appropriate way further if you get it right, bingo! It is very effective. What’s wrong with punishment is when one uses it in the wrong way. Self-Efficacy has always been my thing from the start, but I never realized it until I learned about it from our discussion. I have always been a positive psyche even amidst hard times. My working in Intel gives me new challenges every day and because of my tenet that I can do all the demands of work, I accomplish them well. I live by the adage â€Å"Believe in yourself because if you don’t, nobody else will”. With this, I get more confidence to constrict on higher.\r\n'